As an asnwer to geroge’s questions, I believe it’s important that I answer, even though I am not a pillar. I cannot reply on that post.
| Question | Answer | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | B | Yes to type1/type2 decisions |
| Q2 | A | The minimum requirement for sporks must be the consensus requirement, which I believe is 66% |
| Q3 | C | I think 45 days at most is enough so that all pillars can see the proposal and understand it. I would not let it unlimited, if there is no interest in it, there is no vote, simple. If pillars change their minds, just create the proposal again. |
| Q4 | B | I think 50% is fine, altough, very important, some changes for the bridge (and in the future other embeddeds) like orchestratorInfo should be made with someone that understands the implications for the orchestrator operators |
| Q5 | B | 30 days |
| Q6 | B | I like the idea of depositing and getting the ZNN back if the proposal is accepted, otherwise it’s just like burning them, because the ZNN will be stuck in the embedded. My choice is 5/10 ZNN. The only problem I see is: with 1 ZNN, one could replicate a proposal 100 times, same name, description, etc but other data and pillars won’t know what to vote. The original owner must come in the community and tell pillars what is his address so they know what to vote, meaning also pillar responsibility. The idea with only a pillar creating it could be good, as it decreases the chance of a malicious actor and everyone that creates a project here must should some people from the community, should create a forum post, ask for opinions, no one will just come and post a github link and create the proposal. |
| Q7 | ABC | I would exclude them from all voting in the future if they don’t produce for a long period of time. The only problem here is when do we start looking if the hasn’t produced lately? At the moment of the count? When the proposal was created? What interval? 1 day / week / month? It is also resource intensive to look up this much I believe |
| Q8 | B | Dynamic forum in this form no, as it means that proposals with no interest from the pillars have a high chance of being accepted after a few months. I agree that we need some kind of mechanism for black swans and for now we do, the spork address or hard fork. |