Round 1 of 3
Please see the following work package and discuss/vote on relative value of the Governance Contract work of HC1: HyperQube SIG WP1 - Zenon Wiki
The Governance Contract work is comprised of individual work items which we want to assign points to:
Work Item
Points
Specification
X
Implementation
X
Testing (Manual or Automated)
X
Documentation
X
Explorer Updates
X
Golang SDK
X
Dart SDK
X
Javascript SDK
X
CLI Tooling
X
Future/Bonus
X
As a baseline, the work package starts with 10k points allocated for pillar momentums and votes and 10k points for the work package coordinator, for a total of 20k points.
Round 1 happens during the planning phase.
Round 2 happens as the work is in progress.
Round 3 happens once the work is done.
@vilkris the scope of WP1 is getting the governance embedded onto hyperqube_z. it does not include getting it onto mainnet or syrius changes.
We will likely want to try out the governance for a bit on hyperqube_z first before recommending it for mainnet. Mainnet also has some hurdles like spork creation control, which we may have to hardfork away from the current address. My thought is that Syrius development probably isn’t appropriate until a contract (which may have been change/iterated on) is scheduled for mainnet.
We will have a future work package of
getting gov embedded onto mainnet (hardfork if needed)
automated end to end testing if we don’t include it in this one
Reason for 0 for the JS SDK is that either the JS or TypeScript SDKs requires a lot of work to bring them up to date which I believe would be better as a separate task outside of this work package.