Im happy to vote yes to whoever wants to contribute at the moment as contributors with talent are a rare breed in this diluted market.
I understand the importance of tracking for an organisation who want to reward salesmen and that can continue under the zenon org brand. I also understand the importance of those who feel this is a decentralised experiment project and we are not one big corporate that has to track all leads to plot income flows and try to dissect the reasoning behind aping from links.
Just let it be, we need more work not more politics
No execution plan/timeline. Showing no evidence of qualification. Rather appearing like you only want to secure votes for the idea when not even ready to execute atm.
Will vote no 5 times. Itâs missing many of the principles I suggested a long time ago.
Why are you participating in marketing discussions if you donât understand what white label means in a context of funnels? Yet alone criticize my brand.
Unqualified voters should be deterred from diluting our bags by wasting community funds on âcontributionsâ that donât create any measurable value.
Running a pillar and managing the treasury for the entire community doesnât liberate you from doing basic due diligence just because this is an open source project. On the contrary. You have a responsibility not to misappropriate funds.
Of course you can choose to be irresponsible but then donât be surprised if people call you out for it.
Having a pillar doesnât mean youâre qualified (albeit entitled) to vote on any matter.
You (and others) have a precedent in approving funds for bogus submissions: Zenon Tools
Recent events did not exactly instill confidence that you learned your lesson.
The worst thing about this public debate is that the willingness for selective dilettantism taints the overall perception of this project and undermines the efforts of those who actually build value. By those who donât or refuse to understand it.
While I agree with some points itâs not up to you or mehowz or anyone to dictate how ab A.Z proposal should be formated. Stay agile and donât blindly gatekeep. I feel like some Pillars imagine because they hold a stake in a microcap project theyâre suddenly overqualified. You donât dictate anything.
When I know Iâm not an expert in something, I hire talent. I hired my dev, infra engineering, analytics expert to tune the server-side ops.
Some others in the community: âIâm an infra engineer or dev, but today I decide to put on a marketing hat. Now pay me full value for my time, even though I have never successfully developed a full cycle marketing campaign which proved to work. I donât want to hire someone to come up with the right strategy/mix, I want to get paid for it. I donât think we need to prove if it works, itâs valuable, trust me. I think itâs useful cause other brands did it when they paid successful analysts to develop docs. Iâm them too now.â
Luckily Iâm aware I have only 5 votes. But sure you can accuse me of dictating instead of labelling it as âsuggesting very strongly for the benefit of the networkâ. Appreciate that.
On another note your personal ward are nefarious for the entire project. Respectfully. It goes for all of you. Mehowz wanting to enforce his data driven approach, deeznuts his company ways to do things, others ⌠well. You know. We are all different with different backgrounds and this should be a strength. Donât dilute it because you think youâre better.
At the end of the day what happens will happen and decisions are made by abiding to the rules of the protocol. But itâs anyoneâs right and obligation to speak up if thereâs a risk of additional dilution because grants are approved with zero reason or diligence.